| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
422
   |
Posted - 2012.08.05 08:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
EliteStealth wrote:SIGNED.....WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THAT
Also if Eve is a sandbox why is ccp trying to take away from that mechanic??? Honestly if people like low sec and aren't complaining then wy change it? Furthermore the game isn't about making it easier its about willpower, strength, and determination. The best quote from EVEONLINE I have ever heard is Wow gives you a cookie for each of your accomplishments...EVEONLINE takes your cookie eats it in front of you and laughs at you for brining one in the first place...
I think the main problem is that Lo-sec is a ghost town and people are complaining about it, just not the pirates who live there.
As to the cookie this is stealing part of a pirates cookie and giving it to someone else.
To be honest given the population levels of Lo-sec, you should all be proud. Just about everyone in lo-sec must have come on to these forums by now to complain about this change.
Well at least we have a forum to point to if lo-sec dwellers ever complain that Lo-sec is so dead.
See look what happened last time they thought about changing Lo-sec
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=139926
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
424
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 08:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Gillia Winddancer wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:snake pies wrote:If gate camping was the only "traffic" in low-sec, GOOD RIDDANCE  I predict more kind of the good traffic in low-sec, more roaming gangs. This change kills roaming gangs as much as static gatecamps. MANY average engagements can last several minutes, these changes would kill the interest of anyone engaging on a fight on a gate at all. Where do you expect all this PvP to occur? Have you seen an abundance of ships hanging out in low sec asteroid belts or planetside? Oh dear me. Are we back to the point that gates themselves are the problem once again? Who would have guessed?
Yeah because the way things are people so want to go to lo-sec. I was in there an hour ago traveling and actually saw 4 people over a section of 10 systems(ofc I avoided the usual camped systems).
They were all on local no visual contact. Hell Lo-sec is so crowded, I wonder why CCP want to make it friendlier.
Personally as its still part of Empire but all they have is gate and station guns they should work just like hi-sec. Otherwise why are they there, its kind of stupid.
So gang roam for pvp or go to Null or wormholes where it makes sense.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
472
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 07:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Eddie Monaghan wrote:
Oki's comment about no skill holds no water with me. I've only flown with Tara a handful of times and it was fun. I don't know about his skill in PvP, I haven't flown with him enough to. But then, WHO CARES? It's a GAME, it's MEANT to be FUN!
I don't mind losing ships due to my own mediocre PvP skills, but because CCP made it a PITA to have a good fight on a gate is just plain stupid.
Yes Just plain stupid. Thats how it is now. It makes no sense that you can commit criminal acts right in front of the authorities and get away with it.
You say The game is meant to be fun, for who? Everyone or just you.
The easiest way to look at is CCP made an Error when they set up gate guns as they are now and they are just re-balancing an old error.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
526
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 04:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:How are wardecs broken? Also, how can anyone take you seriously when you post 48 times a day on average and most of it is nonsense? Break Can flipping? WTF? Quit Corp > Disband Corp > Create New Corp > Wardec Disappears. Can Flipping currently exposes you to the owner of the can and the Owner's allies (at least those Allies the owner has bothered to formalize his relationship with). Globally flagging the thief for stealing from you is ridiculous. Lmao! Well, you wanted PvP... From the owner of the can. If they want their stuff, they need to protect it. That's how EVE works. well apparently you can't have your private little grief war against noobs anymore. It adds risk to can flippers where there previously was none, if they chose noobs for a target, which many exclusively do. Can flippers are not know for their bravery. Not everyone wants to pvp in this game right from the get go, its a sandbox game, and high sec is high sec for a reason. When you are a noob and you just want to do a little mining, you shouldn't have to worry about some douchebag stealing your ore risklessly, and you say. "oh, well, get some friends, hire some mercs, blah blah blah", no, **** you. I don't want to have to rely on ppl in this game to do every little thing just because some awful ******* can steal my ore at ZERO risk to himself, if someone is going to steal my ****, he better be taking some kind of risk in doing it. If i have to rely on other people to play a sandbox game, I won't play it. Increased risk to can flippers is all that changes, it doesn't "break" anything. Cry more. Personally I can't wait to blow up some can flippers who are dumb enough to flip when I'm in system. Can flipper tears >>>>>miner tears. This will be great for HS PVP. Previously you couldn't go around exclusively looking to blow up can flippers because you had to be in the same corp as the victim. Its about time the pvp in this game got attractive to real pvpers instead of being the mindless joke it has been for so long. THANK YOU CCP!!
I agree, they want to be big bad outlaws flipping cans, mark them as criminals and let everyone blow there asses up.
Welcome to real PvP 
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
529
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 06:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:The idea of SUSPECT flagged pilots getting shot by LOW SEC gate guns is ******* stupid.
Does that mean that HI SEC suspects get shot by gate guns too?
It not, then the LOW sec ones shouldn't shoot suspects either.
Completely awful.
The idea is sound
If you are a suspect law enforcement shoot at you.
You should be bitching if you get shot at and you are not a suspect.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
529
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 07:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
Just as a funny idea why don't the pirates go hunt the pirates? or is it a problem that pirates might shoot back
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
529
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 07:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Just as a funny idea why don't the pirates go hunt the pirates? or is it a problem that pirates might shoot back This change will prevent pirates from hunting pirates, cause the Gate guns will kill everyone in short order.
Well maybe they could stalk each other in belts, around planets or moons for a change.
Edit: They say a change is as good as a holiday, so say thank you to CCP you pirates
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
534
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 13:20:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
I'm far more concerned about low sec low/null SS residents, those in high sec can biomass or gtfo I don't care and the game will be much better without them:
Given the numbers of hi-sec dwellers, if they gtfo there is no game. Well CCP would benefit from Dust being linked to EvE, so I suppose it could probably afford its server costs but definitely no devs to fix anything.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
| |
|